| Œf�ÚŽGŽ��i˜a�j�F | “ú–{’n�k�HŠwƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€˜_•¶�W |
| Vol�F | 10-2Šª |
| ”N�F |
1998”N
|
| •Å�F |
1923-1928•Å
|
| ’˜ŽÒ�i˜a�j�F |
Šâ�|�@ú}�L�C“z–ì�@‹MŽk�C“í�@”Ž“T�C�²“¡�@‘×�C—Ñ�@‰Æ�Ë�C“c’†�@“w
|
| ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹�i˜a�j�F |
’n‰º“S�\‘¢•¨‚Ì’n�kŽž‹““®‚ÉŠÖ‚·‚é–ÍŒ^ŽÀŒ±‚Ɖð�Í
|
| �´˜^�i˜a�j�F |
–{Œ¤‹†‚Í�A�ã�_�E’W˜H‘å�k�Ђő傫‚È”íŠQ‚ðŽó‚¯‚½‘åŠJ‰w•”‚ð‘Î�Û‚É1�^30ƒ‚ƒfƒ‹‚Ì–ÍŒ^�U“®ŽÀŒ±‚ð�s‚¢�A’n”Õ�E�\‘¢•¨‚̘A�¬‹““®‚¨‚æ‚Ñ�\‘¢•¨‚É�ì—p‚·‚é’n�k‰×�d (’¼“yˆ³�A‚¹‚ñ’f“yˆ³) �A�㉺�°”łƒ†’Œ‚ÌŒ‹�‡�ðŒ� (ŒÅ’èorƒqƒ“ƒW) ‚É‚æ‚é’†’Œ‚É�¶‚¶‚é‚Ђ¸‚݂̈Ⴂ‚ɂ‚¢‚Ä’²‚ׂ邯‚Æ‚à‚É�A‚³‚ç‚É–ÍŒ^�U“®ŽÀŒ±‚Ì�”’lƒVƒ…ƒ~ƒŒ�[ƒVƒ‡ƒ“‚ð�s‚¢�A”íŠQŒ´ˆö‚ɂ‚¢‚ÄŒŸ“¢‚µ‚½‚à‚̂ł ‚é�B�\‘¢•¨‚Ì‹““®‚Í�AŽü•Ó’n”Õ‚¹‚ñ’f‚Ђ¸‚Ý�A“Á‚É�A�ã�Ú“y‚ÌŠµ�«—͂ɔº‚¤‚¹‚ñ’f“yˆ³‚̉e‹¿‚ð‹‚Žó‚¯‚é‚±‚Æ�B‚Ü‚½�A’†’Œ‚É�¶‚¶‚é‚Ђ¸‚Ý‚Í�A�㉺�°”łƂ̌‹�‡�ðŒ�‚É‚æ‚Á‚đ傫‚ˆÙ‚È‚è�Aƒqƒ“ƒWŒ‹�‡‚Ì�ê�‡‚É‚Í�AŒÅ’è‚Ì�ê�‡‚É”ä‚ׂĂ©‚È‚è�¬‚³‚¢ (1�^5ˆÈ‰º) ‚±‚ƂȂǂª“¾‚ç‚ê�A’†’Œ‚Ì”j‰óŒ´ˆö‚Ì1‚‚ªŽÀŒ±‚Ɖð�͂ɂæ‚è–¾‚ç‚©‚ƂȂÁ‚½�B
|
| ƒL�[ƒ��[ƒh�i˜a�j�F |
-
|
| Œf�ÚŽGŽ��i‰p�j�F |
THE EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
|
| ’˜ŽÒ�i‰p�j�F |
Takahiro IWATATE,Takatsugu IINO,Hironori KUSU,Yasushi SATOH,Kasyo RIN,Tsutomu TANAKA
|
| ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹�i‰p�j�F |
SCALED MODEL SHAKING TABLE TESTS AND NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SUBWAY STRUCTURE
|
| �´˜^�i‰p�j�F |
Scaled model shaking table tests of 1/30 scaled subway structure of Daikai station and its numerical simulation have been performed to clarify the dynamic behaviour and the damage mechanism of the sub-way structure. From these tests and analysis, the subway structure was subjected to shear deformati-on of the structure, and the strain of center column in the hinge case about 1/5 smaller than that in fixed case. The cause of collapse of the center column were clarified by the study.
|
| ƒL�[ƒ��[ƒh�i‰p�j�F |
-
|
| ‹LŽ–‹æ•ª�F |
-
|
| ‹æ•ª�F |
ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶�W |