ŒfÚŽGŽi˜ajF | “ú–{’nkHŠwƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€˜_•¶W |
VolF | 11Šª |
”NF |
2002”N
|
•ÅF |
2387-2392•Å
|
’˜ŽÒi˜ajF |
-
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i˜ajF |
-
|
´˜^i˜ajF |
-
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi˜ajF |
-
|
ŒfÚŽGŽi‰pjF |
THE EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
|
’˜ŽÒi‰pjF |
Rajib Shaw, Kenji Okazaki, Masami Kobayashi
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i‰pjF |
EARTHQUAKE-SAFER NON-ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS
|
´˜^i‰pjF |
Non-engineered construction has higher proportion in the building stocks in different parts of the world, with special reference to the developing countries. Rural non-engineered constructions are of specific focus because of the higher rate of damages and casualties. To address the problems of the non-engineered construction, it is required to focus on the participation of people in the process of construction, to provide confidence in the community for safer building practices and to incorporate the livelihood issues in post-disaster recovery process. A case study is presented from Gujarat, India at the aftermath of the earthquake of January 26, 2001, where focus is on the rehabilitation of a model village, with emphasis on the capacity building at the community for safer nonengineered construction practices.
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi‰pjF |
Non-engineered construction, community awareness and participation, confidence building, livelihood.
|
‹LŽ–‹æ•ªF |
-
|
‹æ•ªF |
ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶W |