ŒfÚŽGŽi˜ajF | “ú–{’nkHŠwƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€˜_•¶W |
VolF | 11Šª |
”NF |
2002”N
|
•ÅF |
2349-2354•Å
|
’˜ŽÒi˜ajF |
z–K@mC‹g“c@LˆêC–씨@—LGCŠÖ@¼‘¾˜Y
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i˜ajF |
•¡”Œš•¨‚Ì’nkƒŠƒXƒN“Á«‚ÉŠÖ‚·‚錟“¢
|
´˜^i˜ajF |
-
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi˜ajF |
ƒVƒiƒŠƒI’nkC’nkƒŠƒXƒN‹ÈüC’nkƒ|[ƒgƒtƒH[ƒŠƒIC’nk—\‘ző呹Ž¸—¦
|
ŒfÚŽGŽi‰pjF |
THE EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
|
’˜ŽÒi‰pjF |
Hitoshi Suwa, Shinichi Yoshida, Arihide Nobata, Matsutaro Seki
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i‰pjF |
CHARACTERISTICS OF SEISMIC RISK FOR MULTIPLE BUILDINGS
|
´˜^i‰pjF |
The purpose of this paper is to quantitatively evaluate portfolio seismic risk, which indicates the seismic risk with respect to multiple buildings located at scattered construction sites, through a set of scenario earthquakes in and around Japan. For a simple example, portfolio seismic risk in terms of five story R/C buildings, which are located in Tokyo, Osaka and Sendai respectively, is calculated through the proposed method. As a result, it is confirmed that the effect of risk dispersion by taking advantage of portfolio considerably depends on the checking level of annual exceedance probability of seismic loss ratio.
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi‰pjF |
scenario earthquakes; seismic risk curve; seismic portfolio ; probable maximum loss (PML)
|
‹LŽ–‹æ•ªF |
-
|
‹æ•ªF |
ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶W |