| Œf�ÚŽGŽ��i˜a�j�F | “ú–{’n�k�HŠwƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€˜_•¶�W |
| Vol�F | 11Šª |
| ”N�F |
2002”N
|
| •Å�F |
2349-2354•Å
|
| ’˜ŽÒ�i˜a�j�F |
�z–K�@�m�C‹g“c�@�Lˆê�C–씨�@—L�G�CŠÖ�@�¼‘¾˜Y
|
| ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹�i˜a�j�F |
•¡�”Œš•¨‚Ì’n�kƒŠƒXƒN“Á�«‚ÉŠÖ‚·‚錟“¢
|
| �´˜^�i˜a�j�F |
-
|
| ƒL�[ƒ��[ƒh�i˜a�j�F |
ƒVƒiƒŠƒI’n�k�C’n�kƒŠƒXƒN‹È�ü�C’n�kƒ|�[ƒgƒtƒH�[ƒŠƒI�C’n�k—\‘z�ő呹ޏ—¦
|
| Œf�ÚŽGŽ��i‰p�j�F |
THE EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
|
| ’˜ŽÒ�i‰p�j�F |
Hitoshi Suwa, Shinichi Yoshida, Arihide Nobata, Matsutaro Seki
|
| ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹�i‰p�j�F |
CHARACTERISTICS OF SEISMIC RISK FOR MULTIPLE BUILDINGS
|
| �´˜^�i‰p�j�F |
The purpose of this paper is to quantitatively evaluate portfolio seismic risk, which indicates the seismic risk with respect to multiple buildings located at scattered construction sites, through a set of scenario earthquakes in and around Japan. For a simple example, portfolio seismic risk in terms of five story R/C buildings, which are located in Tokyo, Osaka and Sendai respectively, is calculated through the proposed method. As a result, it is confirmed that the effect of risk dispersion by taking advantage of portfolio considerably depends on the checking level of annual exceedance probability of seismic loss ratio.
|
| ƒL�[ƒ��[ƒh�i‰p�j�F |
scenario earthquakes; seismic risk curve; seismic portfolio ; probable maximum loss (PML)
|
| ‹LŽ–‹æ•ª�F |
-
|
| ‹æ•ª�F |
ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶�W |