ŒfÚŽGŽi˜ajF“ú–{’nkHŠwƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€˜_•¶W
VolF11Šª
”NF 2002”N
•ÅF 2071-2074•Å
’˜ŽÒi˜ajF “c‘º@—Ljê
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i˜ajF ’e‘Y«ƒ_ƒ“ƒp[‚ð—p‚¢‚½’†’á‘w“S‹ØƒRƒ“ƒNƒŠ[ƒg‘¢Œš•¨‚Ì‘Ïk•â‹­|I‹ÇŒÀŠE•ÏŒ`‚ðl—¶‚µ‚½•â‹­Œø‰Ê|
´˜^i˜ajF -
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi˜ajF ‘Ïk‰üCC’e‘Y«ƒ_ƒ“ƒp[C’†’á‘wCI‹ÇŒÀŠE•ÏŒ`
ŒfÚŽGŽi‰pjF THE EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
’˜ŽÒi‰pjF Ryoichi Tamura
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i‰pjF SEISMIC REHABILITATION OF LOW-MEDIUM-RISE REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS WITH HYSTERETIC DAMPERS |SEISMIC CAPACITY CONSIDERING ULITIMATE LIMIT DISPLACEMENT|
´˜^i‰pjF This paper presents seismic capacity of low-medium-rise building which obtained by seismic rehabilitation by means of hysteretic dampers when considered its ulitimate limit displacemrnt. Peak velocity of input ground motion(Vo) inducing ulitimate limit deformation of building is utilized as a index evaluating its seismic capacity. Vo almost increses in propotion to the amount of equipping hysteretic dampers. Seismic performance is compared with earthquake ground motion levels in accordance with mean return periods(Tr).
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi‰pjF Seismic Rehabilitation, Hysteretic Damper, Low-medium-rise, Ulitimate limit displacement
‹LŽ–‹æ•ªF -
‹æ•ªF ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶W