ŒfÚŽGŽi˜ajF | “ú–{’nkHŠwƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€˜_•¶W |
VolF | 11Šª |
”NF |
2002”N
|
•ÅF |
2055-2058•Å
|
’˜ŽÒi˜ajF |
‚‹´@‰ëlCàV“c@KŽiC“¡ˆä@Œ«ŽuC’†”W —ǺC^“c –õŽmC‰ª“c P’j
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i˜ajF |
Šù‘¶“S‹ØƒRƒ“ƒNƒŠ[ƒg‘¢ŠwZŒš’z‚Ì‘Ïkf’fE‘Ïk•â‹Ž–—á‚Ì•ªÍ
|
´˜^i˜ajF |
-
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi˜ajF |
‘Ïkf’fCŠwZZŽÉC’nˆæŒW”C‘Ïk•â‹•û–@
|
ŒfÚŽGŽi‰pjF |
THE EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
|
’˜ŽÒi‰pjF |
-
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i‰pjF |
Investigation on Seismic Capacity and Retrofitting of Existing R/C School Buildings
|
´˜^i‰pjF |
Following the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu Earthquake, seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings designed according to the dated seismic codes have been widely promoted. In this paper, seismic capacities of existing R/C school buildings located in different regions are statistically investigated and their regional characteristics are discussed. The results also reveal that the distribution of seismic capacity index Is in different regions are significantly influenced by the distribution of number of stories and year of construction, and the type of structural planning.
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi‰pjF |
seismic capacity evaluation, school buildings, seismic zone factor, retrofit schemes
|
‹LŽ–‹æ•ªF |
-
|
‹æ•ªF |
ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶W |