ŒfÚŽGŽi˜ajF“ú–{’nkHŠwƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€˜_•¶W
VolF11Šª
”NF 2002”N
•ÅF 1517-1522•Å
’˜ŽÒi˜ajF —é–Ø@Ë”V, Œã“¡@³”ü, ŽR“c@^Ÿ
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i˜ajF ’PˆÊ–Ø‘¢ƒtƒŒ[ƒ€‚ð—p‚¢‚½U“®‘äŽÀŒ±‚É‚æ‚é–Ø‘¢Ž²‘g‚Ì‘Ïk«”\•]‰¿
´˜^i˜ajF -
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi˜ajF ‘Ïk«”\, ‚Ù‚¼ŽdŒû, “y•Ç, •Ç”{—¦
ŒfÚŽGŽi‰pjF THE EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
’˜ŽÒi‰pjF Yoshiyuki Suzuki, Masami Gotou, Masumi Yamada,
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i‰pjF EVALUATION OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF WOODEN FRAMES BY SHAKING TABLE TESTS
´˜^i‰pjF To evaluate the seismic performance of wooden buildings, shaking table tests of wooden unit frames installing various bearing elements were carried out. Four simple frame specimens with different column- sections and tenon-lengths were examined. The results show that the hysteresis loops of these frames are slip type. The frame with larger columnsection had good seismic performance. Four frames with mud wall, mud hanging wall, plywood hanging wall and penetrating tie beams were also examined. As far as the frame with mud wall is concerned, the restoring force was large and the deformation performance was high, and the multiplier of bearing wall obtained here is greatly different from that of the Building Standard Low.
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi‰pjF Seismic performance, Mortise and tenon joint, Mud wall, Multiplier of bearing wall
‹LŽ–‹æ•ªF -
‹æ•ªF ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶W