ŒfÚŽGŽi˜ajF | “ú–{’nkHŠwƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€˜_•¶W |
VolF | 11Šª |
”NF |
2002”N
|
•ÅF |
1465-1470•Å
|
’˜ŽÒi˜ajF |
‰Æ‘º@_˜aC‚‹´@—ǘaC‘]‰ä•”@’¼Ž÷C‰LŽ”@³—T
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i˜ajF |
UBRC\‘¢‚ð—p‚¢‚½¬‹K–Í’f–Ê‹´‹r‚Ì“ñ’iŠK‘Ïk«”\•]‰¿
|
´˜^i˜ajF |
-
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi˜ajF |
UBRC\‘¢C“ñ’iŠK‘ÏkÝŒvC¬‹K–Í’f–Ê‹´‹rC’nkŽž«”\
|
ŒfÚŽGŽi‰pjF |
THE EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
|
’˜ŽÒi‰pjF |
Hirokazu Iemura, Yoshikazu Takahashi, Naoki Sogabe, Masahiro Ukai
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i‰pjF |
The two-level design of compact RC pier with UBRC structure
|
´˜^i‰pjF |
In this research, RC pier with unbonded bars (UBRC pier) is focused. Since this UBRC pier has positive post-yield stiffness, it can be applied the two-level seismic design rationally. From the priliminary analytical studies, the section of the UBRC pier can be reduced from that of the original RC pier. In order to verify the performance of the UBRC piers with compact section, the cyclic and hybrid earthquake loading tests were carried out. As the results, it is found that the performance of the UBRC piers exeeded the original RC pier in te large deformation range. Finally, UBRC piers with compact section are confirmed to be satisfied with the two-level seismic design.
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi‰pjF |
UBRC structure, Two-level seismic design, Pier with compact section, Seismic performance
|
‹LŽ–‹æ•ªF |
-
|
‹æ•ªF |
ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶W |