ŒfÚŽGŽi˜ajF | “ú–{’nkHŠwƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€˜_•¶W |
VolF | 11Šª |
”NF |
2002”N
|
•ÅF |
1051-1054•Å
|
’˜ŽÒi˜ajF |
‘å›Ô@ŒöNCŽsì@_
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i˜ajF |
’nk”íŠQ‚ÆŒ»sŽwj‚Ì…“¹ŠÇ˜H‘ÏkÝŒv–@‚ÉŠÖ‚·‚éˆêlŽ@
|
´˜^i˜ajF |
-
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi˜ajF |
…“¹ŠÇ˜HC’n”Õ‘¬“xU•C’n”ՕψʗÊC‰ž“š•ÏˆÊ–@
|
ŒfÚŽGŽi‰pjF |
THE EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
|
’˜ŽÒi‰pjF |
Kimiyasu Ohtake, Kou Ichikawa
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i‰pjF |
A study on damage and seismic design method of water pipelines
|
´˜^i‰pjF |
In this study, we have compared the water supply pipelines that were damaged by the 1995 Hyogoken Nanbu Earthquake with calculated figures on ductile cast iron pipes by means of the seismic deformation method in the seismic criteria for waterworks facilities. Then we have considered ground velocity amplitudes and surface displacements, which are important when we input conditions by the seismic deformation method. As the result, the seismic calculation figures by means of the method above didnft agree with the actual damages of pipelines under firm grounds. Compared with the actual figures, it is possible that the seismic criteria for waterworks facilities underestimates ground velocity amplitudes and surface displacements on firm grounds.
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi‰pjF |
water pipeline, ground velocity, sground displacement, seismic deformation method
|
‹LŽ–‹æ•ªF |
-
|
‹æ•ªF |
ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶W |