ŒfÚŽGŽi˜ajF | “ú–{’nkHŠwƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€˜_•¶W |
VolF | 11Šª |
”NF |
2002”N
|
•ÅF |
797-802•Å
|
’˜ŽÒi˜ajF |
Žð‹å@‹³–¾CˆÀ’B@r•v
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i˜ajF |
“ñ•ûŒü“ü—Í‚É‚æ‚é–O˜a»’n”Õ‚Ì’nk‰ž“š
|
´˜^i˜ajF |
-
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi˜ajF |
“ñ•ûŒü“ü—ÍC‹Ž²•ûŒüC»’n”ÕC‰tó‰»C‰¼“®“IŽÀŒ±C‰ž“š‘¬“x
|
ŒfÚŽGŽi‰pjF |
THE EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
|
’˜ŽÒi‰pjF |
Noriaki Sako, Toshio Adachi
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i‰pjF |
EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF SATURATED SANDSIN BI-DIRECTIONAL INPUT MOTION
|
´˜^i‰pjF |
Seismic response of the saturated sand layers subjected to uni-directional and/or bi-directional earthquake excitations were investigated using the pseudo-dynamic testing technique. The apparatus was simple shear test device incorporating two cyclic loaders, which were mutually perpendicular. The test results indicate that 1) a major axis direction in horizontal earthquake motion influencing on liquefaction can not be decided by the characteristic of input earthquake motion only, but it also needs to take the characteristic of subsurface sand layers into consideration. 2) The maximum response acceleration, velocity and displacement by the major axis uni-directional input are good agreement with those by bi-directional input , but there are about 15% difference in the pore water pressure ratio between them.
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi‰pjF |
Bi-directional input, Major axis direction, Sands, Liquefaction, Pseudo-dynamic test, Response velocity
|
‹LŽ–‹æ•ªF |
-
|
‹æ•ªF |
ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶W |