ŒfÚŽGŽi˜ajF | “ú–{’nkHŠwƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€˜_•¶W |
VolF | 11Šª |
”NF |
2002”N
|
•ÅF |
763-768•Å
|
’˜ŽÒi˜ajF |
‹g“c –]CàV“c ƒ’jC’†‘º W
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i˜ajF |
’n”Õ‚Ì’nk‰ž“š‰ð̸͂“x‚ɑ΂·‚éŽè–@‚̉e‹¿
|
´˜^i˜ajF |
-
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi˜ajF |
’nk‰ž“šC”ñüŒ`C“™‰¿üŒ`CRayleigh Œ¸ŠCƒ‚[ƒh”ä—ጸŠ
|
ŒfÚŽGŽi‰pjF |
THE EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
|
’˜ŽÒi‰pjF |
Yoshida Nozomu, Sumio Sawada, Susumu Nakamura
|
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i‰pjF |
EFFECT OF NUMERICAL METHODS ON ACCURACY OF EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF GROUND
|
´˜^i‰pjF |
Accuracy of earthquake response analyses of ground is examined focusing on nonlinear behavior and modeling on damping. A conventional equivalent linear analysis is improved to reproduce nonlinear behavior better, and to consider frequency proportional damping. Mode proportional damping is installed in the nonlinear analysis. SHAKE overestimates peak acceleration and maximum stress, and underestimates mplification at high frequency. Rayleigh damping that is frequently used in the engineering practice underestimates high frequency response. Modal damping sometimes cause stability problem therefore special care is required. In conclusion, improved equivalent linear method and conventional nonlinear method can be used in practice except high frequency region.
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi‰pjF |
Earthquake response, Nonlinear, Equivalent linear, Rayleigh damping, Modal damping
|
‹LŽ–‹æ•ªF |
-
|
‹æ•ªF |
ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶W |