Œf�ÚŽGŽ��i˜a�j�F
Šâ”Õ—ÍŠw‚ÉŠÖ‚·‚éƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€�u‰‰˜_•¶�W
Vol�F
24Šª
”N�F
1992”N
•Å�F
371-375•Å
’˜ŽÒ�i˜a�j�F
’ªŒË�@��G�C�@‰Ì�ì�@Šw�C�@�ŸŽR�@–M‹v
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹�i˜a�j�F
Šâ�΂ÌAEƒJƒCƒU�[Œø‰Ê‚ÆAE�kŒ¹•ª•z‚Ƃ̊֌W
|
�´˜^�i˜a�j�F
-
|
|
ƒL�[ƒ��[ƒh�i˜a�j�F
-
|
Œf�ÚŽGŽ��i‰p�j�F
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SYMPOSIUM ON ROCK MECHANICS
’˜ŽÒ�i‰p�j�F
Masahiro SETO, Manabu UTAGAWA, Kunihisa KATSUYAMA
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹�i‰p�j�F
THE RELATION BETWEEN THE KAISER EFFECT OF THE ROCK AND AE HYPOCENTERS' DISTRIBUTION
|
�´˜^�i‰p�j�F
This paper shows the relation between the Kaiser effect of AE in rock and the change of AE hypocenters' distribution. AE occurred in rock sample (sandstone) were measured by 8 sensors. The AE swarm were formed locally during the pre-stress loading. In the stress region over the pre-stress, AE hypocenters were distributed around and outer region of the AE swarm formed by the pre-stress. So. It seems to me that Kaiser effect of AE occurred in the rock are caused by the extension of the micro-cracking regions formed during the pre-stress loading.
|
|
ƒL�[ƒ��[ƒh�i‰p�j�F
-
|
‹LŽ–‹æ•ª�F
-
‹æ•ª
�@�@�@ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶�W