ŒfÚŽGŽi˜ajF
“ú–{’nkHŠwƒVƒ“ƒ|ƒWƒEƒ€˜_•¶W
VolF
9-2Šª
”NF
1994”N
•ÅF
1993-1998•Å
’˜ŽÒi˜ajF
‰Æ‘º _˜a, ˆÉ’Ã–ì ˜as, ‚‘º ®
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i˜ajF
Ž©—ãŒ^“®‹zkŠí‚ÌŠJ”‚ƧkŒø‰Ê‚ÉŠÖ‚·‚éU“®‘äŽÀŒ±
|
´˜^i˜ajF
-
|
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi˜ajF
-
|
ŒfÚŽGŽi‰pjF
PROCEEDINGS OF THE JAPAN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM
’˜ŽÒi‰pjF
Hirokazu lEMURA, Kazuyuki lZUNO, Hisashi TAKAMURA
ƒ^ƒCƒgƒ‹i‰pjF
DEVELOPMENNT OF THE SELF OSCILATING TMD AND ITS SHAKING TABLE TESTS
|
´˜^i‰pjF
To reduce dynamic response of flexible structures with moving mass . there are passive , active and hybrid control methods. In this study, a 4 D. O. F. flexible and lightly damped structual frame model with and without these control devices are tested under earthquake ground motion generated by a shaking table. From the test with AMD ( active mass damper ) , the variable gain control is found to be effective for wide range of input intensity. And , the SOTMD ( self oscilating tuned mass damper ) which is one of the active TMD is newly developed. Then , the efficiency of 2 control algorisms is compared. It is found that the SOTMD with the most effective control algorisms needs only lO% of the AMD for the same level of dynamic response reduction.
|
|
ƒL[ƒ[ƒhi‰pjF
-
|
‹LŽ–‹æ•ªF
-
‹æ•ª
@@@ˆÏˆõ‰ï˜_•¶W